[EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability

[James Green-Armytage]

Hi folks,
	I've been doing some more work on my definitions and criteria page, and
I'd be quite happy to get some more feedback. 

http://fc.antioch.edu/~james_green-armytage/vm/define.htm

	I am having great fun constructing summary tables to visually represent
the compliance/noncompliance of different methods. Here are the bookmarks
to the summary tables.
http://fc.antioch.edu/~james_green-armytage/vm/define.htm#summary
http://fc.antioch.edu/~james_green-armytage/vm/define.htm#stratsum
http://fc.antioch.edu/~james_green-armytage/vm/define.htm#continsum
http://fc.antioch.edu/~james_green-armytage/vm/define.htm#miscsum
	I also made a page of all the tables together, without any explanation...
It might go out of date or get deleted, but for now, here it is:
http://fc.antioch.edu/~james_green-armytage/vm/define_tables.htm

	The most interesting table to me is the one that is by far the most
subjective: The strategy summary. I tried to give several methods a
strategic vulnerability score for 5 different types of strategy. Some
people who prefer these types of scores to have a firm mathematical basis
may consider this to be useless. However, I think that it may be useful as
a rough (not precise) information source. I'd be happy to discuss/debate
the scores that I decided on for any given cell.
http://fc.antioch.edu/~james_green-armytage/vm/define.htm#stratsum

all my best,
James