[EM] James, SFC
nkklrp at hotmail.com
Thu May 5 23:56:29 PDT 2005
Basically, SFC and GSFC say that you shouldn't be able to pull off a
successful burying strategy just by truncating your ballot, or insincerely
ranking two candidates as being equal
No, that isn't what SFC and GSFC say. They apply to all methods, not just
rank methods, and not just to truncation strategy or any offensive strategy.
For instance, Pluralitly and IRV fail SFC, though not through any offensive
strategy of any kind.
You're telling me what SFC and GSFC say. I suggest that since I wrote them,
it's for me to say what they say. For instance, SFC says that if no one
falisifes a preference, and if a majority prefer the CW to Y, and vote
sincerely, then Y shouldn't win.
SFC says that, not what you claim that it says.
-- instead, if you want to bury
someone, you have to actually reverse at least one preference ordering. I
recognize the usefulness of these criteria, and I consider them to be a
valid point in favor of winning votes against margins, but I don't think
that their importance should be overstated. That is, they don't mean that
strategizing voters will have less of an ability to bury a candidate, they
just means that they need to use reversal rather than truncation to do so.
I submit that if voters are determined to strategize, the need to use
order-reversal won't be much of a barrier.
There's a big difference between a problem that can happen if signifilcant
numbers of voters attempt offensive order-reversal, and one that happens
automatically, or by mere truncation. Offensive order-reversal on a scale
sufficient to affect the outcome isn't likely. When SFC says "if noone
falsifies a preference", that's a convenient way to say it,but obviously the
same thing is true if preference-falsification isn't done by a group large
enough to change the outcome.
I always say that under certain plausible conditions, it won't be necessary
to do other than rank sincerely.You object that that isn't true under all
conditions. But such a nonprobabilistic method is impossible. You're asking
too much. But, under the plausible conditions under which such a guarantee
can be made, wv makes it, because wv meets SFC.
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
More information about the Election-Methods