[EM] Re: rank/approval cutoff ballot
Araucaria Araucana
araucaria.araucana at gmail.com
Thu Jul 21 15:58:49 PDT 2005
On 21 Jul 2005 at 12:45 UTC-0700, Araucaria Araucana wrote:
> What about this primary method:
>
> Approval ballot (as above)
>
> A candidate with more than 50% first place votes wins outright.
Correction:
If there is at least one candidate with more than 50% first
place votes, the first-place vote winner wins outright.
>
> Otherwise, if there is at least one candidate with more than 60%
> (75%? what is the safe cutoff?), the approval winner wins
> outright.
Actually, 50% might be fine. That would strongly discourage promotion
of weak opponents.
>
> Otherwise, all candidates with more than 1% approval are advanced
> to the general election and listed in order of first-place vote
> totals, with approval scores also noted.
>
> The general runoff election would use some ranked ballot method,
> e.g. a ranked approval ballot with DMC tally :-).
>
> Write-ins would be allowed on the approval-primary ballot, but
> not on the general election ballot.
An alternative to not allowing write-ins would be to allow up to N
"official" write-ins, with, say, 1000 valid signatures turned by 1
week before the election. They would be assigned one of N extra codes
allowed in that race. I think Abd made a suggestion to this effect already.
>
> The primary would have to be close enough to the general election
> to be meaningful -- within 60 days, for example.
>
Q
--
araucaria dot araucana at gmail dot com
http://www.metafilter.com/user/23101
http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/User:Araucaria
Q = Qoph = "monkey/knot" -- see http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/alphabet.html
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list