[EM] Re: Reply to A. A. about sloppy quoting

[Araucaria Araucana]

MIKE OSSIPOFF <nkklrp <at> hotmail.com> writes:

> 
> I'd said:
> 
> >You said:
> >
> >Could you please show proof that WV (RP/Beatpath/River) passes
> >Consistency and CWP does not?
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> I'm getting weary of the sloppy quoting
> 
> I reply:
> 
> What sloppy quoting? Did you or did you not say:

Read what I said.  Remember what I've contacted you about before.

I meant standard email protocol:

   Name <address> wrote [on date]:
   >
   > etc.
   >

with threaded Subject header.

I do appreciate that you've managed to fix your apostrophes, and I see that
sometimes you can insert leading ">" signs.

Read the other suggestions and give them a try.  Please!

Honestly, you're a bit like my cousin who says "strange that those 4 other
clocks are wrong -- I know my wristwatch is accurate!  I've checked it 10 times"
 when he is 5 minutes slower than the official US atomic clock.

A.A.