[EM] Re: Cardinal Pairwise: Guilty till proven innocent

[Araucaria Araucana]

On 26 Apr 2005 at 15:01 UTC-0700, MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote:
> But wait....Does Cardinal Pairwise pass Participation and
> Consistency? Did you know that Plurality passes those criteria?

I'm not following this argument.

WV doesn't pass Participation either.  How is Cardinal Weighted
Pairwise any different?

Could you please show proof that WV (RP/Beatpath/River) passes
Consistency and CWP does not?

Thanks,
-- 
araucaria dot araucana at gmail dot com