[EM] Re: Ballot Design
Araucaria Araucana
araucaria.araucana at gmail.com
Fri Apr 8 10:11:02 PDT 2005
On 8 Apr 2005 at 08:38 UTC-0700, Lloyd Caesar wrote:
> This may be a bit off topic. It's about art not science. How should
> an STV ballot be designed for ease of use and ease of counting. (For
> the rules, let's say, paper ballots, computer count, manual recount
> if necessary) A simple list of names with spaces next to them
> forwriting in a number is clear for voters but difficult for
> poll-workers who can't use a computer for the count(without
> foolproof OCR) and have to decipher handwriting. Names with
> numbered circles to fill in (SAT style) reqquire as many numbers as
> there are candidates, possibly a huge number in say a multi-party
> 9-seat (about the largest practical) election. Furthermore, voters
> can lose track of the numbers as they move around the ballot and
> accidentally spoil their ballots. What might work? any ideas?
Hi Lloyd,
How about an abacus-like approach?
500 50 5
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
100 200 300 400 10 20 30 40 1 2 3 4
Here's how you might represent various numbers:
3:
500 50 5
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
100 200 300 400 10 20 30 40 1 2 3 4
7:
500 50 5
( ) ( ) (X)
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( )
100 200 300 400 10 20 30 40 1 2 3 4
62:
500 50 5
( ) (X) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( )
100 200 300 400 10 20 30 40 1 2 3 4
489:
500 50 5
( ) (X) (X)
( ) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
100 200 300 400 10 20 30 40 1 2 3 4
--
araucaria dot araucana at gmail dot com
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list