[EM] IRV in San Francisco
davek at clarityconnect.com
Fri Nov 12 10:47:26 PST 2004
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:06:23 -0500 Eric Gorr wrote:
> At 7:44 AM -0800 11/12/04, Justin Sampson wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Eric Gorr wrote:
>> > Well, it will cause IRV to fail the Independence of Clones
>> Criterion and
>>> thereby be subject to a spoiler effect again.
>> Doesn't IRV suffer from spoiler effects anyway?
> The method itself passes the ICC, so spoilers cannot come from there.
> It, of course, fails IIA (as all ranked ballot methods do), so spoilers
> in this context still exist. Of course, since no ranked ballot methods
> pass IIA, talking about spoilers in this context is not very interesting.
> Are there more directions from which spoilers can appear?
> I am currently not aware of any.
I do not keep up with the alphabet soup, but IRV and Condorcet disagree as
to winner in the following, and I see Nader as a spoiler for IRV:
35 Nader, Kerry
Condorcet sees 35 Nader as ignorable and then 60 Kerry vs 40 Bush
IRV discards 25 Kerry; then sees 40 Bush vs 35 Nader.
davek at clarityconnect.com people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek
Dave Ketchum 108 Halstead Ave, Owego, NY 13827-1708 607-687-5026
Do to no one what you would not want done to you.
If you want peace, work for justice.
More information about the Election-Methods