[EM] New criterion: Independence Of Weakly DefeatingAlternatives(IWDA)

[Paul Kislanko]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: election-methods-electorama.com-bounces at electorama.com 
> [mailto:election-methods-electorama.com-bounces at electorama.com
> ] On Behalf Of Paul Kislanko
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:36 PM
> To: 'Jobst Heitzig'; election-methods-electorama.com at electorama.com
> Subject: RE: [EM] New criterion: Independence Of Weakly 
> DefeatingAlternatives(IWDA)
> 
> "And how does IWDA relate to IPDA and ISDA?"
> 
> Well they all have the same number of letters, and all 
> contain both an I, D,
> and A in the same order. W is clearly < P < D.
 Just as clearly, I meant < S