[EM] Spoiler Effect on Wikipedia

[Eric Gorr]

>Hallo,
>
>>  So would passing the strong version of IIA (and by strong version, I
>>  assume we are speaking about the one Dr. Arrow used) imply passing
>>  ICC?
>
>As I said: Random Candidate, David Catchpole's Random Candidate, and
>Random Pairs satisfy IIA and violate ICC.

I am not talking about the IIA variant that you prefer, but Dr. 
Arrow's variant (which does not involve probabilities - unless I am 
mistaken), so my question to you stands.