[EM] Single Winner Systems categorization
Adam Tarr
atarr at purdue.edu
Wed Jun 23 17:46:22 PDT 2004
Tom,
sorry I didn't respond earlier - I've been to busy for EM stuff lately.
This setup is, broadly speaking, acceptable to me. "One Choice" voting
seems well defined enough. Given this categorization, I have no problem
with putting Approval in the rated ballot section.
I only have one significant objection - the use of "sequential rounds" as a
sub-category. I don't think it's a good term for either "One Choice"
methods or "Ranked Choice" methods. I just don't think "round" is well
defined in this case.
For one choice methods, a better term would be something like "successive
balloting" or something else that clearly indicates a physical return to
the polls.
In the ranked choice methods, I still maintain that the sequential rounds
section is not really meaningful. As I said earlier, I can create a
Condorcet-compliant method that has sequential elimination, and I can even
write out approval or Borda so that they will have elimination rounds. Do
those three methods really need their own sub-category?
Also, Proportional Approval Voting (PAV) should be included among
distributed proportional methods.
-Adam
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list