[EM] Bill: Re: our criteria & definitions

[Kevin Venzke]

Mike,

 --- MIKE OSSIPOFF <nkklrp at hotmail.com> a écrit : > 
> Approval doesn't meet our CC. But Approval & Plurality meet Blake Cretney's 
> CC. Or they would except that Blake avoids that by stipulating that CC 
> applies only to rank methods. Our CC applies meaningfully and as-expected to 
> all methods. Check Markus's CC. If Markus defines CC, most likely Plurality 
> passes Markus's CC too, unless Markus copies Blake's stipulation that CC 
> applies only to rank methods.

I note that Plurality can be made to fail Condorcet, without reference to
sincere preferences, by interpreting Plurality as a ranked method which 
disregards all but the first preference on each ballot.

This works with Approval, too, if for instance disapproved candidates are
considered to be ranked equal in last place.


Kevin Venzke
stepjak at yahoo.fr


_________________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com