[EM] David Gamble reply, 1/23/03 1012 GMT

Markus Schulze markus.schulze at alumni.tu-berlin.de
Sat Jan 24 03:33:01 PST 2004

Dear David,

you wrote (23 Jan 2004):
> A common way for somebody to promote a 'pet' electoral method is to do
> the following:
> 1/ Find a set of criteria that your system meets and state them.
> 2/ Dismiss the criteria your method doesn't meet as irrelevant or even
>    better just don't mention them.
> 3/ Make your selected criteria sound as important as possible (really
>    build them up).
> 4/ Describe your selection of criteria as 'objective' ones that have
>    been selected by 'experts'.
> 5/ Prove that your method meets them and that other methods don't.

Then what do you think about my paper?:

Markus Schulze

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list