[EM] David Gamble reply, 1/23/03 1012 GMT

[Markus Schulze]

Dear David,

you wrote (23 Jan 2004):
> A common way for somebody to promote a 'pet' electoral method is to do
> the following:
>
> 1/ Find a set of criteria that your system meets and state them.
> 2/ Dismiss the criteria your method doesn't meet as irrelevant or even
>    better just don't mention them.
> 3/ Make your selected criteria sound as important as possible (really
>    build them up).
> 4/ Describe your selection of criteria as 'objective' ones that have
>    been selected by 'experts'.
> 5/ Prove that your method meets them and that other methods don't.

Then what do you think about my paper?:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/election-methods-list/files/nmciswem.pdf

Markus Schulze