[EM] Contd, "Completion" & falsification
MIKE OSSIPOFF
nkklrp at hotmail.com
Fri Jan 23 00:59:02 PST 2004
Kevin said:
Mike:
>Say a voter refuses to express a preference between X and Y. Anyone who
>says that that voter is saying that s/he prefers X to Y, and that s/he also
>prefers Y to X, must have their head all the way up their ass.
It's not necessarily saying that.
I reply:
So you agree that you're modifying the ranking to say something that the
voter didn't say, but you say that that isn't a falsification of
preferences.
You continued:
The idea is that the effect should be the
same.
I reply:
So you're saying that the effect should be the same after you attribute to
the voter preferences that the voter didn't express.
Mike Ossipoff
_________________________________________________________________
Let the new MSN Premium Internet Software make the most of your high-speed
experience. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/prem&ST=1
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list