[EM] supermajority
Markus Schulze
markus.schulze at alumni.tu-berlin.de
Tue Dec 28 06:56:15 PST 2004
Dear James Green-Armytage,
these proposals to combine Condorcet methods and
supermajority requirements have been discussed in the
"Debian-EM Joint Committee" between December 2000 and
April 2001.
******
You wrote (27 Dec 2004):
> Tally: Do a ranked pairs tally. We'll call the winner
> option A. Is A consented to by at least 70% of the voters?
> If so, option A is selected. If not, then the status quo
> remains in place.
In the Committee, this proposal was called "Ossipoff".
******
You wrote (27 Dec 2004):
> Tally: Eliminate all candidates who are not in the minimal
> dominant set, and who are not consented to by at least 70%
> of the voters. If any candidates remain, hold a ranked pairs
> tally between them to determine the winner.
In the Committee, this proposal was called "Miller-1".
Markus Schulze
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list