[EM] ironclad pro-Condorcet argument?
robla at robla.net
Mon Aug 23 21:24:56 PDT 2004
James Green-Armytage wrote:
> If there is a Condorcet winner with regard to the sincere preference
>rankings of voters, and the voting method is plurality, then the Vote is
>only at equilibrium when the Condorcet winner is selected.
If casual observers could understand and believe it, then I think it
would be. However, this is a little too abstract for most folks to get
their heads around (though I like Steve's "arena voting" metaphor).
The most bulletproof argument I know of for Condorcet is: "If there is a
Condorcet winner with regard to sincere preferences, then the winner of
a Condorcet election will beat the winner of any election method that
doesn't choose the same candidate." In short, the Condorcet winner
will beat the IRV winner every time.
More information about the Election-Methods