[EM] Batch of old messages
David GLAUDE
dglaude at gmx.net
Thu Nov 20 16:13:02 PST 2003
Obviously answer to the problem is to really moderate the list... not
every 20 days.
Another solution is to have multiple moderator... they will all get the
SPAM but the processing of wrongly sended mail to the list will be much
faster... (in my case I used a wrong email address to send).
David GLAUDE
PS: I was one of the victime of a delayed mail: [does Election-methode
require e-voting?] from the 4/11/2003, it was an introduction to the
list + the very specific question I wanted to ask you all (is hand
counting possible).
Since it was the day I joined the list and I did not saw a copy of my
post, there was no way for me to know if it has been posted without
risking double posting. I saw no answer either (this could have been a
hint).
> The downside is that it would be nice to make the list open. Doing so
> would mean that people can still contribute to the list even if they don't
> want to put their e-mail address into the database.
The main question is to know if the database should be:
A secret (except for administrator)
B open to the member
C open to every-one
If A then there is no reason not to subscribe to the list. ;-)
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list