[EM] An odd case for Ranked-Pairs

[Eric Gorr]

This example was recently brought to my attention.  Consider:

   A>C>B>F>D>E
   B>C>E>F>D>A
   D>B>A>F>E>C
   E>A>B>C>F>D
   E>D>A>B>C>F
   F>C>D>A>B>E

The pairwise matrix is:

   0 4 4 2 3 4
   2 0 4 3 4 5
   2 2 0 4 3 4
   4 3 2 0 3 2
   3 2 3 3 0 3
   2 1 2 4 3 0

Now, with Ranked-Pairs, the only kept-defeat will be B:F.

However, once all of the defeats have been considered, there will be 
no kept-defeats for <someone>:E, which allows E to participate in a 
tie (according to my computations).

Now, the problem with this appears to be that E also does not have 
any pairwise-victories, which would seem to indicate that it should 
not have the opportunity to be selected as the victor.

Now, it would seem to me that, in the case of a tie, I should verify 
that each option in the tie did have at least one pairwise-victory 
and if they did not, eliminate them from the tie.

Would anyone else agree or have I made a mistake in here somewhere?

----
For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc), 
please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em