[EM] Blake's margins arguments
honky1998 at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 19 14:33:07 PST 2003
> Before we sell the public on Condorcet we need to get ourselves heard
> over the cacaphony of pro-IRV voices. Seen in that light, the new
> Approval Voting organization seems like a much better horse to back in
> any race.
Obviously, I couldn't agree more. :-) Thanks so much to all of you who
have joined CAV. Those who haven't, please check us out at
> So I put that issue pretty low on the list of things to care about. If
> other people find it stimulating to debate that, have fun, but I'm
> agnostic on it for all practical purposes.
Really I am too by this point, which explains my long silence on the boring
margins/winning-votes debate. I just have to chime in every once in a
while for the sake of newcomers who might get the impression that there's
wide agreement on the list that winning-votes is superior.
> Keep this in mind about selling the public on winning votes or margins:
> Nobody says "Bush won Florida with <number of votes>", they say "Bush won
> Florida by 537 votes" or whatever the final margin was.
Excellent point . . . I never thought of it that way.
rob at approvalvoting.org
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc),
please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em
More information about the Election-Methods