[EM] Re: Observations of a Poll Worker
asmall at physics.ucsb.edu
Thu Mar 7 13:54:31 PST 2002
Josh Narins wrote:
>Is it just me, or does it sounds like everyone in Santa Barbara can vote
>First time normally, second time claiming that the first time was fraud.
Good point. However, there would be a signature in the roster and a
signature on the provisional ballot. Those would match. I guess you could
disguise your handwriting, but you'd have to gamble that we won't
think "That person looks familiar" and put up a red flag when we contact
the elections office.
Also, an allegation of voter fraud would almost certainly trigger a police
investigation, since it's an allegation of a felony. Similar signatures or
suspicious poll workers would make the police rather curious.
Anyway, point is, the system does have some (imperfect) mechanisms to
prevent double-voting. I do think ID should be required, but I didn't
write the laws. We do the best we can with the laws in place. If you want
a defense of not requiring ID ask somebody else.
More information about the Election-Methods