[EM] P&P say there's only 1 preference profile. You don't say that.
markus.schulze at alumni.tu-berlin.de
Thu Jan 31 02:48:55 PST 2002
you wrote (30 Jan 2002):
> Plurality, Approval, RB, & RC pass Regularity so defined. CR
> fails, because the criterion only talks about order.
Due to Pattanaik and Peleg, the input of a decision scheme is
a set of linear orders. So when you define plurality on lone-mark
ballots then plurality isn't even a decision scheme. And when you
define plurality on ranked ballots then plurality clearly fails
You wrote (30 Jan 2002):
> Maybe they meant: Deleting a loser from the election's ballots
> and then recounting those ballots should never decrease the
> win-probability of an undeleted candidate. That sounds like
> the probabilistic version of my IIAC.
Pattanaik and Peleg talk about _adding_ candidates and not about
More information about the Election-Methods