[EM] One Man One Vote in equation form; Power and rejecting Approval

Craig Carey research at ijs.co.nz
Fri Aug 2 06:35:10 PDT 2002

At 2002\08\01 22:32 -0700 Thursday, Richard Moore wrote:
 >This gives Craig another chance to respond, but I expect he will opt
 >out again and launch into more irrelevancies. If so he will certainly
 >have the last word.

Members can browse to my long reply which is now at this webpage:


It repeats the inductive argument over the deletion of the digits
of the numbers representing the satisfaction of a paper with the
outcome. The desire of a paper is needed for the idea of FPTP
papers reproducing or outdoing the outcome that can be had by
adding to the collection, the paper whose power is being tested.

Various of the questions of Mr Moore are responded to.

G. A. Craig Carey
New Zealand

For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc), 
please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list