[EM] STV bad example
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
Tue Nov 6 19:20:27 PST 2001
The below is from another email list regarding election stuff.
----
The [use of] STV [in a single member district] may serve to eliminate the
preferred candidate who may be no one's first choice yet everyone's second
choice.
Example: Let us assume an election where 100 voters must elect one of four
candidates A, B, C and D. The electors may vote according to 24 patterns. For
simplicity's sake, let us assume that they vote according to three patterns
only and that candidate B is second in all three patterns (3rd and 4th ranks
are immaterial but let us assume that they divide the votes.)
The patterns are ABXX, CBXX, DBXX.
Let us now assume the following results:
ABXX = 40
CBXX = 36
DBXX = 24
total = 100
An analysis of the results will reveal that B is preferred to A by 60 votes,
to C by 64 votes and to D by 76 votes. While B is preferred to all other
candidates, with STV, candidate B would have been eliminated.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list