# [EM] Right to Left Majority Losers

DEMOREP1 at aol.com DEMOREP1 at aol.com
Thu Mar 22 18:23:21 PST 2001

```Using a place votes table, yet another tiebreaker involves a simple summing
of place votes from the right to get majority losers when there is no
Condorcet Winner.

Example-
123
34 ABC
33 BCA
32 CAB

99

A  65
B  66
C  67 loses

A beats B.

Expanding to 4 choices using Mr. Schulze's recent example-
-----
Example 1:

3 voters vote A > B > C > D.
2 voters vote D > A > B > C.
2 voters vote D > B > C > A.
2 voters vote C > B > D > A.

The pairwise matrix looks as follows:

A:B=5:4
A:C=5:4
A:D=3:6
B:C=7:2
B:D=5:4
C:D=5:4

B and D are SSD winners. When SSD is re-applied among candidate B
and candidate D, then candidate B wins decisively.

[End Schulze]
---
D- 4th plus 3rd place votes

A  4
B  2
C  7  Loses
D  5
18

3 voters vote A > B > D
2 voters vote D > A > B
2 voters vote D > B > A
2 voters vote B > D > A

A:B=5:4
A:D=3:6
B:D=5:4

Tie continues.

A 6
B 7 loses
D 5
18

D beats A.

Generally since there is

Desired > Compromise > Unacceptable

by eliminating (highest) majority unacceptable choices from the right to
left, folks can vote for their desired choices as long as possible.

That is, a minority desired choice (even a 49.99 percent minority) may get
eliminated (sorry for many folks --- liberal, conservative or whatever) BUT
such minority should be encouraged to make lesser of evil choices among the
remaining choices.   That is, for such minority group folks, when their
desired choice loses, a compromise choice moves left/up on the ballots.

For legislative body elections the elimination amount would be just over the
reverse Droop Quota for N seats --- Total Votes minus Droop Quota for N seats
remaining).

The above is connected to clones and/or divided majorities..  *IF* clones
and/or parts of a divided majority appear, then they shift the votes to the
right.

I note again the simple appearance of a third choice into 2 existing choices.

C appears.