Misdemeanor vote indecision
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
Mon Mar 19 21:12:52 PST 2001
Mr. Ossipoff wrote in part --
But changing how you intend to vote, surely that's only a misdeme[a]nor.
X, it later turns out, was going to lose. But then I decided to rank
X last instead of first, and he won. No one has tampered with ballots.
No one has peeked at the ballot-box. The rankings were reported after
the election.
---
D- How will Mr. Ossipoff detect that some choice *was going to lose* unless
such choice actually loses (especially in a mass public election-- such as
the circa 105 million votes for U.S. President in 2000) ???
How will Mr. Ossipoff detect that ONLY *his* vote changed the results ??? By
more election law felonies ???
Are ANY of the other voters also playing the reverse order insincere/
strategy voting game (or are they just being naive and voting sincerely --
such that ONLY Mr. Ossipoff among ALL the voters is playing the insincere/
strategy voting game) ???
Is choice X elected by a majority of the voters (whether sincere or
insincere) ???
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list