[EM] Responses to some of Forest's ideas
Forest Simmons
fsimmons at pcc.edu
Tue Jul 17 10:01:34 PDT 2001
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Rob LeGrand wrote:
> Forest wrote:
> > 3. It eliminates the occasional low utility Condorcet Winner.
>
> I question the advantage of this . . . advantage. ("Allow myself to introduce
> . . . myself.")
Here's an example of this (zero info):
45 A >> B > C
45 C >> B > A
2 C > A >> B
4 B > A >> C
4 B > C >> A
B is the low utility CW that gets eliminated, having only 8 percent
approval. Demorep's method gives C the win because it is the CW among the
candidates satisfying the minimum approval standard.
Does it bother you that after the results are announced, the first faction
(A's supporters) might regret not having (insincerely) approved B ?
Forest
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list