[EM] Re: Is "Inverse Nanson" better than standard Nanson?

[DEMOREP1 at aol.com]

Mr. Schulze wrote in part-

Due to Condorcet, when one "eliminates" a proposition of
an opinion then one still has an opinion. Therefore, it
is clear that "eliminating" can only mean "inverting".
---
D- As usual, I must note that changing ballots is a major election felony in 
most countries.

Would Condorcet have been convicted of committing an election law felony ???

Since Condorcet *relative* votes may produce a circular tie, then some other 
tiebreaker should be used instead of *inverting* ANY votes.

The standard example-

34 ABC
33 BCA
32 CAB
99

66 A B 33
67 B C 32
65 C A 34

A whole lot of votes would need to be *inverted* --- circa one-third.