CR pairwise

Roy royone at
Thu Aug 30 13:03:41 PDT 2001

Forest Simmons wrote:
> This recent CR pairwise is meant to be simpler than Dyadic approval
> via CR, otherwise probably inferior.

Simpler for tabulating by hand? Or how do you mean simpler? The most 
complex part I can see is figuring out the biggest boundary crossed. 
Is that what you're trying to overcome?

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list