[EM] Re: Ratings as a standard
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
Sat Feb 12 10:12:15 PST 2000
I would suggest that John./Mary Q. Voter would rate candidates plus 100
percent to minus 100 percent.
Due to problems with negative numbers among folks who have not had (or
forgotten) algebra regarding negative numbers, I would suggest staying with
the old reliable 100 to 0 scale (if scales are to used at all) or a scale
with twice the number of choices (to allow above average and below average
ratings).
Example- 5 choices
Scale 10 to 1-- 10 to 6 above average, 5 to 1 below average
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list