Nominating Standards and Goals
Charles Fiterman
cef at geodesic.com
Tue Oct 6 06:18:38 PDT 1998
At 09:12 AM 10/6/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Dear Charles Fiterman,
>
> You wrote: "We are nominating only goals not methods."
>
> Sorry Charles, but I am nominating standards to be used to evaluate
>methods.
>
> But I will nominate the following goal:
>
> The goal of this exercise is to select the method that will elect the
>candidate that is the preferred choice of the voters.
Can you be more clear? How do we know that this goal has been met?
In private email someone also said.
>I nominate:
>
>1) Voting truthfully will advantage and not disadvantage you (where
>possible)
>
>2) It should be hard for any candidates to split the vote
Again explanation is required. I volunteer.
1) People aren't punished with loss of power for voting the way
they feel. People who vote dishonestly feel badly about themselves
and often stop voting alltogether.
2) You can't hurt a candidate by having someone with stands
near to theirs enter the election.
3) The system should avoid gross paradoxes as they cause loss
of faith in the system.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list