The Anti-Democratic Gerrymander

David Marsay djmarsay at dera.gov.uk
Fri Oct 16 05:12:51 PDT 1998


In response to:
> From:          DEMOREP1 at aol.com
> Subject:       The Anti-Democratic Gerrymander

> Some folks may be unaware that the use of the gerrymander is a major tool of
> anti-democratic tyrants.
<SNIP>
> In real elections, there may be less than 25 percent indirect minority rule
> since all districts do not have the same number of voters and there may be
> more than 2 candidates in each district.
> 
> Thus, any country using all single member districts in its election system for
> legislative bodies is a tyranny-- such as the United States government, every
> State government in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India, etc.,
> etc.
> 
> The use of some sort of single winner election reform method to elect 1 person
> in a district does very little to reduce such indirect minority rule.
> 
> The remedy since the 1840's has been the use of a proportional representation
> election method for legislative bodies to get BOTH indirect majority rule and
> minority representation.

What about Lord Jenkins' AV Plus compromise? ( Single-winner 
elections, with a 'top-up' to give overall proportionality)
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry, but apparently I have to do this. :-(
The views expressed above are entirely those of the writer
and do not represent the views, policy or understanding of
any other person or official body.



More information about the Election-Methods mailing list