First minus last tie breaker

Charles Fiterman cef at
Mon Nov 2 06:50:33 PST 1998

At 06:42 PM 10/30/98 EST, you wrote:
>Mr. Ingles wrote in part in Re: More Standards-
>Even if the voters are completely sincere and rational, then to the extent
>that they vote along ideological or partisan lines the "best candidates" will
>be the same as the "worst candidates" when looking at the raw returns.  For
>example, suppose two major factions of equal size vote ABCD and DCBA for
>purely ideological or partisan reasons.  You end up with candidates A and D,
>who are tied for both first and last place. In this case, all this really
>means is that you have redundant information in the last half of the list.
>D- The above suggests yet another head to head tiebreaker if there is/are no
>Condorcet winner(s)--

If we have a tie between ABCD and DCBA it is likely that we have
a small electorate and will get a tie between A and D in the runoff.
The runoff only serves to delay the selection and waste tax money
on running another election.

I prefer the traditional American solution of a single hand of five
card draw poker. More international is to flip a coin.

One of the candidates in the meta election is the requirment of
decisiveness. The election must make the decision in all cases
and not put it off.

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list