Tideman vs. Schulze
npetry at sk.sympatico.ca
Fri Jul 31 10:50:25 PDT 1998
Today, I mistakenly wrote:
>that's been proposed. Aside from failing Markus' "Positive Participation"
>criterion (which I don't think any method has been proven to satisfy), it's
That should have been "No-Punishment Criterion", rather than "Positive
Participation Criterion". Also both Mike and Markus did point out a number
of (otherwise inferior) methods which do meet this criterion. I guess I
should have checked my notes!
Sorry about that.
More information about the Election-Methods