Always impossible! - not

[Saari at aol.com]

In a message dated 98-07-15 20:39:41 EDT, you write:

>D- Thanks for the clarification.   Mr. Saari's proposal is an attempted
>reversal of some 700 + years of trying to get 1 person-1 vote in Anglo-
>American history and deserves the strongest condemnation possible.   

You want to give every voter only a single vote - with resulting lack of
precision, ambiguity and lesser-of-evils second-guessing.  I want to allow
each voter to express their feelings on each candidate, and with sufficient
breadth to allow truly informed group decisions.  Is this so horrible?

Mike Saari