[EM] Markus, "majority-rejected", and some Markus opinions

[MIKE OSSIPOFF]

Markus said:

In my recent mails, I wrote that Mike Ossipoff's concept
of "majority rejected" candidates cannot be used for other
election methods than MinMax.

I reply:

But which of my criteria use the term "majority-rejected"?

As I said, my defintiion of defensive strategy uses the term "majority 
rule", and, as I said, I´ll post that definition after I get caught up with 
list e-mail.

Markus continues:

I also consider his concept
of "offensive" and "defensive" strategies not promising.

I reply:

How´s that for a powerful argument :-)

By the way, Markus, I asked you if any one of a particular list of methods 
fails your "SFC version", and if any one of another particular list of 
methods passes your "SFC version". You haven´t answered that question. When 
you post a crirterion, one could expect you to be able to apply your 
criterion.

But let me make it simpler: If you aren´t ready to answer the question 
referred to in the previous paragraph, then, for now, answer this quesion:

Does BeatpathWinner meet your criterion that you posted as an alternative 
wording for SFC?

Mike Ossipoff

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/