[EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election

[James Green-Armytage]

I wrote:
>
>> 	I know that Mike Ossipoff has said that we should all come together
>> around a winning votes method without an additional anti-strategy
>measure.
>> But I'd like to hear what some other people think. 

Russ wrote:
>
>If the EM community adopts this approach, you will be no further ahead 
>in 30 years than you are today. I guarantee it.

Now, I write:
	What exactly do you think is wrong with that approach? Please don't say
that defeat-dropping completion methods are too difficult to understand,
because I won't be convinced that your Condorcet/approval method is easier
to understand. Is it the winning votes part that you have a problem with,
or the no additional anti-strategy measure part? My own reservations are
primarily with the latter (strategy) part, as I mentioned. 
>
my best,
James