[EM] The matter of whether people strategize
anthony_duff at yahoo.com.au
Mon Jan 19 21:06:02 PST 2004
--- Bart Ingles <bartman at netgate.net> wrote: >
> On the other hand, I actually met an Australian lady who said that
> regularly voted for minor candidates whom she didn't even like,
> just to
> keep her favorite major-party representative from getting too full
That would not be terribly unusual. Representatives, and
governments, take their primary vote very seriously, and if it is
high enough they get confident/arrogant, and every policy statement
they ever made becomes "mandated by the people", which means "how
dare the opposition even question it".
I am surprised that the lady couldn't find a candidate that she
liked, there are enough of them. However, we are generally quite
confident that our minor party candidate won't actually be elected,
and I think that if there was actually a good chance of the minor
candidate being elected then some people voting in protest would
A typical voting pattern in some Australian electorates is
with B being readily eliminated under IRV. I think there is an
instinct to bury the strongest challenger.
However, I think that if the voting method was suddenly changed to
condorcet then the voting pattern would change, with B beng put last
a lot more often.
http://personals.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Personals
New people, new possibilities. FREE for a limited time.
More information about the Election-Methods