[EM] Districts from gnomonic map have virtually right angle corners.
nkklrp at hotmail.com
Sun Jan 11 20:44:53 PST 2004
You mentioned the advantage of a conformal projection, which correctly
But though the gnomonic isn't conformal, districts that result from
rectangles on a gnomoniic are practically indistinguishable from
rectangular. Their corners differ from a right angle only by a tiny amount.
Even if the entire U.S. were mapped with the gnomonic projection, centered
at the center of the country, a district, at one extreme end of the country,
at the periphery of the map, a district which is square on the gnomonic map
will, on the ground, have corners that only differ from right angles by
about 1.4 degrees. That's if the district has one of its corners pointed
toward the center of the map. If the district has one of its _sides_ pointed
toward the center of the map, and if it has the average area that national
senate districts would have if the senate had districts, then it's corners
will differ from a right angle by only a fraction of a degree.
And if, instead of a national map, it's a state map, even for a state with
great extent, like California, the districts' corners will only differ from
a right angle by a fraction of a degree, regardless of how they're oriented
with respect to the center of the map.
So, to have districts whose corners don't differ perceptibly from a right
angle, it isn't necessary to use a conformal projection or a cylindirical
Districts whose boundaries are latitude/longitude llines will have corners
that are exactly right angles.
The longitude lines, meridians, are straight lines on the ground. The
latitude lines, parallels, are circles on the ground--constant curvature. If
you were driving a road along a parallel, you'd have the steering wheel at a
constant position to drive along the parallel.
Longitude/latitude district lines, the geographical earth co-ordinate
system, is an appealing way to make rectanglar districts.
The all-straight district lines made by rectangles on a gnomonic projection
are appealing too
Previously I'd said that the gnomonic would give noticibly unsquare
districts when a country as big as the U.S. is mapped. Not so. I'd initially
believed that because I'd seen gnomonic maps showing nearly half of the
world, and maps of such a large area can have great area exaggeration and
shape distortion at the periphery, especially for large shapes. But that
isn't true of the gnomonic when it's mapping a country. Well of course a
country as large as Russia would have somewhat more departure from
rectangularness than the U.S. would.
Get a FREE online virus check for your PC here, from McAfee.
More information about the Election-Methods