[EM] Re: Dyadic Rated Pairs
    DEMOREP1 at aol.com 
    DEMOREP1 at aol.com
       
    Mon Sep 24 20:45:23 PDT 2001
    
    
  
Mr. Simmons wrote--
Trying to lock in the last pair A > B contradicts the partial order
induced by the previously locked in pairs, so we throw it out.
In summary, B > C > A .  We got this result without assigning numerical
weights to the inequalities of various strengths. Only their strength
order was used. 
----
D- Mr. Simmons *throws it out* and not *we throw it out*.
Who has a YES majority (with or without sincere or strong support votes) ???
Why is voting for a candidate so much different than voting on an issue (such 
as shall such and such act or omission be a crime) ???
    
    
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list