Fewest votes in worst defeat tie breaker

[Mike Ossipoff]

Another very long description of a new method, by Demorep. And, as
usual, no hint of why that method is supposed to be better.

I'm not going to take the time to figure out what that message
means to say, about its proposed method, and to determine in what
way it screws up. It's for the proponent of a method to say why
it's better, and no one else has a responsibility to evaluate it
unless specific claims are made for it, in regards to properties.

Same with Don's modified Coombs. I haven't checked it out yet, and
I might not get to it. But if Don wants to make a specific claim
about its properties, then I'll ;check out the validity of the
claim.


Mike


--