Tobin-Condorcet bad example? (was Re: Election Methods

[Steve Eppley]

Hugh T wrote:
>I think it should be called Smith//Condorcet (Tobin) or
>Smith//Condorcet (1/2), or something similar, in order to make clear
>this is a minor adjustment I propose, nothing anywhere near as
>signficant as Smith. 

In my opinion, Smith is a less significant adjustment than (Tobin).

---Steve     (Steve Eppley    seppley at alumni.caltech.edu)